The recent ongoing test match where Dravid played an excellent knock in the first innings got me into thinking 'who has played the maximum number of balls in the test cricket?' Well i was pretty clear on who it might turn out to be, but there were few surprises as well. This is the overall list,
I always thank Cricinfo for the data they own and how they have helped us by letting users query on that data. Here is the top ten
On the first glance at the list, I realized Border & Boycott even though from the previous era, still managed to make it at number 3 & 9. Border may not be entirely from the previous era but still to see him at number 3, tells the sheer responsibility he carried to build a strong Aussie team. For Boycott, the catch here is, the number innings he has played against the number of innings the current crop of players have played. One more surprise entry was Lara, but he did make one of the biggest scores in test cricket and that is attributed by the fact that he has the best strike rate amongst the top ten. Amazing stat!
Lets take a step back and poke into the 70s-90s era and see who tops the list. The following list takes into consideration only till the year 1990
To be fair, I don't see any contrast in strike rates but the number that is surprising is the runs scored. The number of tests played is a significant factor but on the first look, to me, it looks like runs scoring then was really tough. All the top batsmen here are technically excellent and are predominantly openers or No 3 against the current crop of players in the first list who are predominantly either No.3 and No.4 batsmen. It is not that Openers have lost sheen in the current era, I think the openers have moved beyond getting the shine out of the new ball to scoring runs with the hard ball.
There are various interesting facts that can be inferred from the numbers, but to me it is a question between 'Has the standard of bowling gone down'? or 'Has the batting improved a lot and the conditions prevailing now are more in favour of the batsmen than the bowlers'?
Information Courtesy: Cricinfo
P.S: Whatever it is, in local parlance these guys had 'Suga Gaaji' :-)
I always thank Cricinfo for the data they own and how they have helped us by letting users query on that data. Here is the top ten
Player | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Ave | Balls Faced | SR | 100 |
R Dravid | 155 | 268 | 31 | 12570 | 270 | 53.03 | 29673 | 42.36 | 34 |
SR Tendulkar | 179 | 293 | 32 | 14754 | 248* | 56.52 | 27305 | 53.99* | 51 |
AR Border | 156 | 265 | 44 | 11174 | 205 | 50.56 | 27002 | 41.09* | 27 |
JH Kallis | 145 | 246 | 38 | 11947 | 201* | 57.43 | 26418 | 45.22 | 40 |
SR Waugh | 168 | 260 | 46 | 10927 | 200 | 51.06 | 22461 | 48.64 | 32 |
S Chanderpaul | 133 | 227 | 36 | 9367 | 203* | 49.04 | 22226 | 42.14 | 23 |
RT Ponting | 152 | 259 | 28 | 12363 | 257 | 53.51 | 20827 | 59.36 | 39 |
MA Atherton | 115 | 212 | 7 | 7728 | 185* | 37.69 | 20709 | 37.31 | 16 |
G Boycott | 108 | 193 | 23 | 8114 | 246* | 47.72 | 20412 | 35.42* | 22 |
BC Lara | 131 | 232 | 6 | 11953 | 400* | 52.88 | 19753 | 60.51 | 34 |
DPMD Jayawardene | 119 | 196 | 13 | 9630 | 374 | 52.62 | 18370 | 52.42 | 28 |
On the first glance at the list, I realized Border & Boycott even though from the previous era, still managed to make it at number 3 & 9. Border may not be entirely from the previous era but still to see him at number 3, tells the sheer responsibility he carried to build a strong Aussie team. For Boycott, the catch here is, the number innings he has played against the number of innings the current crop of players have played. One more surprise entry was Lara, but he did make one of the biggest scores in test cricket and that is attributed by the fact that he has the best strike rate amongst the top ten. Amazing stat!
Lets take a step back and poke into the 70s-90s era and see who tops the list. The following list takes into consideration only till the year 1990
Player | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Ave | Balls Faced | SR | 100 |
G Boycott (Eng) | 108 | 193 | 23 | 8114 | 246* | 47.72 | 20412 | 35.42* | 22 |
AR Border (Aus) | 111 | 192 | 33 | 8488 | 205 | 53.38 | 20270 | 41.48* | 23 |
SM Gavaskar (India) | 125 | 214 | 16 | 10122 | 236* | 51.12 | 15327 | 44.42* | 34 |
DI Gower (Eng) | 106 | 183 | 13 | 7383 | 215 | 43.42 | 14714 | 50.17 | 15 |
GS Chappell (Aus) | 87 | 151 | 19 | 7110 | 247* | 53.86 | 13079 | 51.53* | 24 |
Javed Miandad (Pak) | 101 | 153 | 18 | 7701 | 280* | 57.04 | 12564 | 46.50* | 22 |
JH Edrich (Eng) | 77 | 127 | 9 | 5138 | 310* | 43.54 | 11542 | 37.14* | 12 |
CG Greenidge (WI) | 96 | 163 | 15 | 6826 | 223 | 46.12 | 11018 | 49.14* | 17 |
DL Haynes (WI) | 85 | 146 | 17 | 5340 | 184 | 41.39 | 10970 | 43.50* | 12 |
DB Vengsarkar (India) | 105 | 168 | 22 | 6498 | 166 | 44.5 | 10506 | 42.75* | 17 |
To be fair, I don't see any contrast in strike rates but the number that is surprising is the runs scored. The number of tests played is a significant factor but on the first look, to me, it looks like runs scoring then was really tough. All the top batsmen here are technically excellent and are predominantly openers or No 3 against the current crop of players in the first list who are predominantly either No.3 and No.4 batsmen. It is not that Openers have lost sheen in the current era, I think the openers have moved beyond getting the shine out of the new ball to scoring runs with the hard ball.
There are various interesting facts that can be inferred from the numbers, but to me it is a question between 'Has the standard of bowling gone down'? or 'Has the batting improved a lot and the conditions prevailing now are more in favour of the batsmen than the bowlers'?
Information Courtesy: Cricinfo
P.S: Whatever it is, in local parlance these guys had 'Suga Gaaji' :-)
1 comment:
Sugathil-sugamaana-suga-sugangal! See Boycott's strike rate...
Post a Comment